When you admit you are wrong, you have to define what made you wrong in the first place. Reality's time management of social outcomes daily or real time daily living just adapting since conceived in series parallel positions of ancestry limited to adapting to life dawn to dusk every rotation alive since [personally added to life by genetic outcomes so far.Deezer Shoove » Yesterday, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑ Is it possible to expect people to show the weakness of being wrong? Or changing their view?
We have posters here that, from what I can tell, act like any number of other cyber-forums.
Sarcasm is called lies. Mean stuff is inaccurately referred to as sarcasm. Analogies taken out of context.
Things that are just pounded home day after day. Useless for the most part except to try to needle someone.
Sure, there are times when a "reminder" makes sense. Priceless stuff.
Most of it ain't priceless though.
Once in a great while when someone admits they were wrong a modicum of respect is shown.
Maybe even a greenie or two. So why is it so rare?
Is being an infallible Chatroom Champ really that enticing?
There many examples of all this crap but I'm starting out neutral.